The LA Times is running a live Election Returns Map which will be ongoing until the voting is over nationwide.
To keep track of it, Bookmark this page:
It will be a long while before a lot is up there (right now there is only a teeny bit of New Hampshire), but this will be a helpful track keeper.
- How To Watch Tonight’s Election Results Online (readwrite.com)
- Foursquare’s ‘I Voted’ map delivers your real-time election day fix (digitaltrends.com)
- Ways to Engage: Election Night (learning.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Daily Kos Elections Morning Digest: Bookmark our poll closing times map & key races list for Tuesday (dailykos.com)
The Friskey has published a Handy Dandy Guide with a great chart. Isn’t it amazing how these men don’t seem to ever have asked a woman what being raped and/or getting pregnant from it means? The Friskey comments on the gentlemen in the chart:
“I have such a hard time remembering which conservative politician said what ridiculously offensive thing about rape. They’re all old and white and most of them are in some state of partial baldness. They all look the same! And they all sound basically the same too, given that woman-hating bile spews from their open pie holes. Alas, they are all individual people, who hold or have held positions of power within government, and aspire to inflict their beliefs upon your life.”
You know, there are people who listen to and agree with these terrible concepts and who admire all five of these Republicans. You can bet Mitt and his buddy Ryan are included in these.
I will be amazed when someone comes out with the statistic after the election of how many women voted Republican. It is as if they would enjoy being treated like cattle.
- Obama slams Mourdock: “Rape is rape” (blogs.suntimes.com)
- RAPE “that’s something God intended” GOP Senate Candidate Tells Women (theageofblasphemy.wordpress.com)
- Shady Pennsylvania Republicans Pass New Law Requiring Women To Prove They Were Raped! (bossip.com)
- Meet The Mourdocks: The Other Republicans Pushing To Block Abortions For Rape Victims (thinkprogress.org)
- Introducing ‘Emergency Rape’, This Season’s Hottest Rape Trend [Video] (jezebel.com)
- The real Republican rape platform | Jill Filipovic (guardian.co.uk)
“America’s economic future, the quality of our health, and the quality of our environment depend on our ability to continue America’s proud legacy of discovery and invention. As winners of the Nobel Prizes in science, we are proud of our contribution to the extraordinary advances American science has made in recent years. But we’re deeply concerned that without leadership and continued commitment to scientific research the next generation of Americans will not make and benefit from future discoveries.
“President Obama understands the key role science has played in building a prosperous America, has delivered on his promise to renew our faith in science-based decision making and has championed investment in science and technology research that is the engine of our economy. He has built strong programs to educate young Americans in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics and programs to provide Americans the training they need to keep pace with a technology-driven economy.
“If you believe, as we do, that America’s future is bound in essential ways to science and innovation, we urge you to join us in working to ensure the reelection of President Obama.”
You can find the entire letter here. I would urge you to read it… and pass it around.
- Science and Medicine Nobel Prize Winners Support Obama (biotech.about.com)
- Sixty-Eight Nobel Prize Winners Endorse Obama (addictinginfo.org)
- Obama Picks Up Nobel Endorsements (news.sciencemag.org)
- Nobel Laureates Endorse Obama (thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com)
And Monday night we’ll hear his foreign policy ideas…
– and –
Then again, Romney seems to present the Voter’s Right To Choose.
– and –
Is there anything Romney won’t switch positions on?
– and –
Pat Bagley in the Salt Lake Tribune
Winning and Losing causes great party differences…
– and –
Matt Bors in the Portland Mercury:
And he keeps up his attempt to get women’s votes…
It’s a pretty substantial 20%… the question is will they show up? Here’s the demographics:
Here in the Shepherd University area where we see an awful lot of the youth category daily, we are curious as to how involved students are getting in the campaigns. From what I see it is minimal at best.
How is it where you are? Does it look like we will surpass the 2008 election or fall below it’s total of young voters? We’ll have to wait and see.
- Loreto urges youths to register to vote (leytesamardaily.net)
- UPA ‘cheating’ youths: Modi (thehindu.com)
- ‘Discussion on Voter Turnout at the Economic Club (jonathanjuteau.wordpress.com)
- Reaching First Generation College Students (insidehighered.com)
- New ID Laws May Shoot Down College-Student Voters (huffingtonpost.com)
A note about this section of Under The LobsterScope. Every Sunday, unless I am hospitalized or on the road to a far away place, I do Cartoon(s) of the Week. If it’s a week where one editorial cartoon has stood out as towering above the others, that’s all that will appear. Most weeks, however, I present several of the best cartoons I have found, usually on a current news theme.
Your comments on this section, whether you agree with my choices or not, are greatly appreciated. If you send a sample of your favorite to appear with your comment, please include the cartoonist’s name (often hard to make out on the cartoons) and the publication it appeared in.
Perhaps Mitt should have avoided ANY comments until learning about the situation…
– and –
Bill Shorr from Cagle Cartoons:
Then again, why nor use foreign policy to campaign with?
– and –
Of course, supporting the President is un-Romneylike.
– and –
Mike Luckovich in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
Mitt – you live in the mess you’ve made.
- Cartoon(s) of the Week – Is anything what it seems? (underthelobsterscope.wordpress.com)
- Cartoon Nails It (ken_ashford.typepad.com)
Hmmm. Rick pitched this at the Value Voters Summit:
— Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R)
The opposite of elite and smart = the dregs and stupid… so I guess this is how Santorum sees his conservative colleagues who are on their side.
- Education snobbery? (ellsmere.wordpress.com)
- Rick Santorum: Says President Obama has waived “the work requirement for welfare.” (politifact.com)
- Santorum: By ‘Pursuit of Happiness,’ the founders meant ‘To Pursue God’s Will’ (secularnewsdaily.com)
- Ed Kilgore: Rick Santorum’s Jihad Continues… (delong.typepad.com)
- The hateful message of Rick Santorum (sfgate.com)
Take a look:
It sure looks like the conservatives have it pretty fine…not to mention the fact that they also seem to be getting more coverage.
So don’t let the complaints of the right fool you. They know where their advantage lies.
- Bill O’Reilly And Panel Take On Liberal Media Bias And Young Voter Support Of Obama (mediaite.com)
- Glenn Beck on Liberal Media Bias (notyrants.blogspot.com)
- Former TV Producer On MSNBC WaWa Edits: ‘I’m Done’ Denying Liberal Bias (mediaite.com)
- Liberal Media Bias: 2,000 U.S. Troop Deaths in Afghanistan – Only CBS Reports (vocalminority.typepad.com)
- Former Network TV Producer Disgusted by Andrea Mitchell Wawa Edits: ‘I’m Done’ Denying Liberal Bias (newsbusters.org)
- Liberal Media Bias: NYT, WaPo Cover Attack by Jews, Not Against Jews (vocalminority.typepad.com)
Radical Conservatives, are not trying to understand, they are using Righteous Passion to light the fires of their political rhetoric – the flames of which are meant to burn Progressives and Liberals as heretics at the stake.
Radical Conservatives seek nothing less than to dominate, and eliminate Progressive and Liberal thought from the discourse, in fact they are damn tired of talking and trying to understand; they want action, and they want it now.
Progressives and Liberals will lose this debate because they are trying to understand the world and how to safely fit everybody in it.
Radical Conservative do not suffer this discomfort, they don’t want you in their world, unless you change to fit in theirs, they will do everything in their power to eliminate you and your progressive ideas from even getting a seat at the table.
So… if you want to include everyone in our world, you are like me and other progressive/liberals. Wasn’t it the fascists who wanted to cut out people they didn’t agree with, much less understand them.
- Radicals Or Conservatives (crodamilo.wordpress.com)
- Moochers and looters (balloon-juice.com)
- Conservatives, Liberals, and Happiness (maverickphilosopher.typepad.com)
If you filed on April 15th and want to find out how much you saved in your taxes, you can go to FairEconomy.org and take the Tax Fairness Pledge”… something the top 400 of the very rich could effect our whole economy by taking. The top 1% of the country took in 90% of the income gains in 2010, so they’re doing just fine. But lately the folks at the top have not been asked to pay their fair share in taxes.
If these rich folks had paid their fair taxes, what could it have meant? Just how rich are they?:
Even if they only paid ALL of their Income gains above 35% they could cover at least half of all this stuff!
What about you? Are you paying your fair share (or more) of taxes? You can find out HERE by using the calculator, then sign the Tax Fairness Pledge, where you can select necessary areas to contribute excesses to.
My thanks to United For a Fair Economy.
- Why it’s time for a single income tax | Matthew Elliott (guardian.co.uk)
- Those wacky rich folk and their taxes (dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com)
- Extend austerity measures to allow for major tax cuts, chancellor told (guardian.co.uk)
- Video: What is the Fair Tax? (turbotax.intuit.com)
- Graduate tax proposals divide coalition (confused.com)
- Pennsylvania GOP State Rep. Hasn’t Signed Norquist Tax Pledge Because ‘I Have To Do What’s Right And What’s Fair’ (thinkprogress.org)
- GOP rookies revolt against Grover (politico.com)
If it’s not clear to you yet, Reich‘s explanations can be very revealing:
Pass this on to anyone who doesn’t see what conservative Republicans are doing to the economy. If we all stand up against it… especially in the upcoming Congressional Elections… we can bring back a growing and successful America.
By Mike Ludwig, Truthout| Report
The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) voted today to require major commercial TV stations to post online public files and political advertising files that detail crucial information on the campaign advertisements they air.
Media reform advocates are cheering the new rule, which comes as Super PACs and campaign groups are expected to spend record amounts of money on television ads to influence upcoming national elections.
The files have been publicly available for years, but most stations only keep hard copies at physical offices. Until now, reporters and activists seeking information on political advertising have had to show up in person, request the files and even pay copying fees.
—->Read the rest of the article HERE.
“You need to be outraged, but you also need to move beyond outrage, and take action,” says Reich as he comments on what we can do to assure that the country does not fall into the hands of conservative extremists.
You can get it at Amazon… the order address is at the end of the video:
… while I’m in the process of moving houses, I’m not doing my usual political ramble (of course, I’ve had no television to pick up the political stuff, but, wonder of wonders, Comcast showed up this morning.)
Anyway, here are a few more wall art masterpieces;
I love the tiger!
My thanks to Bruce for bringing attention to this as we see the conservative elite clamp down on possible voting immigrants…
- “A shitty time to be a liberal”: The Economist’s must-read piece on the Clegg paradox (and 2 reasons why it’s wrong) (libdemvoice.org)
- Self-induced Sluggishness – Economist on the world economy (themitochondrialmigrator.wordpress.com)
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:27 PM
Earlier this month was the birthday of Ayn Rand, the controversial philosopher and novelist, who emigrated from the Soviet Union in 1926. Regardless of what one thinks of her ideas, there is no denying that she was a great American. When the American intelligentsia was playing footsie with Soviet communism, Rand unabashedly defended liberty and individual rights, America’s core values, famously declaring: “[The] United States of America is the greatest, the noblest and, in its original founding principles, the only moral country in the history of the world.”
But this proud naturalized American, who arguably did more than any contemporary figure to restore the faith of Americans in America, might have been hounded out of the country if one of our current crop of Republican hopefuls had been president when she arrived. Why? Because Rand lied and bent every rule to gain…
View original post 6 more words
So what I want to know is which of these Repub candidates has any kind of grasp on mid-east policy? Certainly Iran knows that they can be completely wiped out by us with little or no provocation.
- US, Europe cautious on Iran offer for nuke talks (sfgate.com)
- GOP candidates take hard line on Mideast (politico.com)
- Can the US stop Iran going nuclear? (americablog.com)
- Russia is preparing to respond to Israeli or US military strike on Iran (irannewpearlharbour.wordpress.com)
So the SuperCommittee isn’t getting anywhere. So what will the government do about our financial problems.
And what about jobs?
- Does the GOP enjoy the misery of others? (dangerousminds.net)
- Truth Squad takes on GOP debate (politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com)
- Daily Kos Elections Morning Digest: Peter Kinder bails on Missouri governor’s race (dailykos.com)
Last night at the Sustainable Shepherdstown Local Food meeting we discussed food safety, among other things.
We played the Ted Conference piece by Robyn O’Brien on poisoning in food. It led me to research more about Monsanto and the chemical poisoning all our food which they are carrying out through government manipulation and media control.
Take a look at this:
And look at this one:
Now what are you going to do about it?
“The answer is: yes, many of the protesters do understand what Wall Street and more generally the nation’s economic elite have done for us. And that’s why they’re protesting.”
Let’s see… did they push worthless mortgages and leave the lower middle class holding the bag?
Did they make millions while many of us lost just about everything because of their activities?
Is the sky above us?
Want to buy a National Touring Bus? I guess one will be available now that Sarah Palin has announced that she won’t be entering the Presidential race (what a surprise!)
So what will she do now to maintain her personal publicity program?
- Sarah Palin Won’t Run For President [Sarah Palin] (gawker.com)
- Sarah Palin ends the fever pitch of speculation swirling around her presidential ambitions (dailykos.com)
- 5 questions about Sarah Palin (politico.com)
- Sarah Palin won’t run either (geneveith.com)
- Sarah Palin won’t run in 2012 (thestar.com)
- GOP Reacts to Palin No-Go (thepage.time.com)
- BREAKING: Sarah Palin Will Not Be Running for President (sfist.com)
- Sarah Palin: Inside Her Decision Not To Run (abcnews.go.com)
It was bad enough that the Republican debate audience did the “let them die” chant at the previous gathering of dolts, last night they booed a gay soldier who asked a reasonable question: would these clowns back up the repeal of “don’t ask don’t tell.:
Take a look if you missed it:
If , as is estimated by some analysts, the gay population is about ten percent of the voting block, these damned fools don’t seem to mind that they’ve cut off another vote source.<img title=”Send Us Mail” src=”https://underthelobsterscope.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/ppals1.jpg” alt=”” width=”72″ height=”72″ />
“Every single poll shows that the American public overwhelmingly supports higher taxes on the wealthy as part of a package to cut the deficit. The margins are staggering: the NYT poll shows a majority of 74 – 21; even Rasmussen shows a majority of 56 – 34. What the president proposed this morning is simply where the American people are at. If he keeps at it, if he turns his administration into a permanent campaign for structural fiscal reform, I don’t see how he loses the argument.”
– Andrew Sullivan