Daily Archives: March 22, 2011
On May 24th I’ll be sixty five and another 1st generation Baby Boomer will be officially “Old” (though, because of our cruddy economy which stands between employment and age, I am already retired and at the mercy of Social Security… which my Congressional leadership wants to do away with).
Most of my adult life I have been a liberal Democrat… in college during the height of the Civil Rights movement and the fiercest part of the anti-Vietnam War campaign, as a working citizen through booms and busts in the economy ending in the major recession we are apparently now out of (except in my house… yours too?)… and I voted as a liberal Dem in the past couple of elections. Now I’m not certain that “liberal Democrat” has meaning anymore.
While I shudder at people who are now called “Originalists” (heard this term on a CATO Institute panel on C-Span, where it was tied as a label on Justice Clarence Thomas), who think of the Constitution as unchangeable and fixed, I am upset with some lack of adherence to Constitutional regulations which have not been changed in the document, but have certainly been changed in practice.
The power to declare war, for instance, is still Constitutionally the province of Congress, and specifically the House. Yet, from my earliest childhood when Truman got us into the “Korean War” – called a “Police Action” because it was never declared by Congress (and also never ended, btw); to my early adult years when LBJ got us into the “Viet Nam War“, started as a Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG), again, without the declaration by Congress as a war; to the first “Gulf War” that George H. W. Bush got us into without a Congressional Declaration; to the Second “Gulf War”…also known as the “War in Iraq”… which has really not ended since it was followed by a decade of occupation, which spread from George W. Bush through Bill Clinton to Barack Obama and continues, to some extent, today (although the government would have us believe that it is over); to the current “War in Afghanistan” started by Bush 2 a year before the Iraq War, allowed to simmer over a low flame for a dozen years, then refocused and put into first place by Barack Obama; I have seen the Congress give up it’s war declaration responsibilities and the Executive Administration take the freedom to do whatever they want with the Military it commands.
Whew…sorry for the long paragraph above. I had to get it out, however.
Now we are in a conflict in Libya, not yet called a “War”, although as you watch the TV news you can see that label arriving on swift feet. The President didn’t bother doing anything with Congress on this… they were on vacation (from the tedious job where they work from Monday to Thursday, then spend the rest of their week raising money for the next election) after all… but took the excuse of a U.N. Resolution taking precedence over our National Law and all of a sudden we are in our third Middle East conflict, going on simultaneously with the first two. And we’re doing all of them without a supporting economy… the romance of borrowed funds.
Now I read that the Conservatives in Congress are going to come back this week, from the much needed time off they have had, and express opposition to Libyan war. As Representative Roscoe Bartlett (R – Maryland) said last night:
Of course, some would say that the Conservative Republican majority in the House, by spending most of their year on voting against anything their more liberal colleagues are in favor of, in areas which have little to do with our current problems, ignoring the unemployment problem the recession has created and deciding to “fix” the economy by defunding most of the services that keep us going, while making sure the rich don’t get taxed, has also been in an affront to our Constitution.
I’m getting more and more upset with both sides of our elected officialdom and with the outrageous empire we have established worldwide with our 200+ military bases and rush to be the “defense” force in countries where there is oil for our insatiable power demands. I am frustrated that, as an individual, there seems to be little or nothing I can do about the situation, with the one exception of pointing the problems out in this blog. Voting doesn’t seem to solve the problem because politicians lie… they run saying they will do one thing…they get elected…and then they become the managers and implementers of the “same old same old.”
The Corporate World eats up the majority of our economic resources. The Corporate world controls the officials their support elects. The Corporate world does not mind that they have allowed our millions of jobs to move to China and India for cheap costs and have wrecked our own economy in the process. Yet they are not a power that is recognized by our Constitution… only by those our Constitution allows us to elect.
I guess I would like to define myself as a “Constitutional Progressive” and no longer as a “Democratic Liberal.” I would like to see us uphold those regulations and responsibilities that the Constitution-as-Amended contains, yet support changes in the Constitution that reflect our current world and the protection of the people in our Nation without depriving them of their rights and input. That means not an “Originalist” viewpoint, but a believer in the social and political equality of citizens and the ability to lead full and meaningful lives in a country that our taxes support.
I don’t know if this is likely, but I will campaign for it as if it is.
- Libyan bombing ‘unconstitutional’, Republicans warn Obama (guardian.co.uk)
- Congressional Declaration of War?…. (tagg-lines.com)
- Libyan bombing ‘unconstitutional’, Republicans warn Obama – The Guardian (news.google.com)
- The Note’s Must-Reads for Tuesday, March 22, 2011 (blogs.abcnews.com)
- Congress, The President, And War Powers Under The Constitution (outsidethebeltway.com)
- The campaign against Libya is constitutional. (slate.com)
- Attack Renews Debate Over Congressional Consent (nytimes.com)
- What Ever Happened to the Antiwar Movement? (britannica.com)
- Obama’s Libyan War (amconmag.com)
- 7 Questions For Liberals About Obama’s Libyan War (rightwingnews.com)
- Libyan War and the Media’s Reaction (thedailybeast.com)
- Criticism of attacks heard in Congress (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Left-Wing Media Responses to Obama’s Libya Invasion (rogueoperator.wordpress.com)
- Libyan Hangovers (themoderatevoice.com)
- Obama’s Lack of Libya Leadership Could Make It the Next Iraq (usnews.com)
- Was Obama In the right to Attack Lybia? (wdednh.wordpress.com)
- As missiles fly, pols still at odds (philly.com)
- Where Is The Anti-War Movement? (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
- Happy 20th Anniversary to the “End” of the 1991 Gulf War…the War That Never Actually Ended (alternet.org)
- Beyond the crisis of liberalism | Stanley Aronowitz (guardian.co.uk)
- Baby Boomers reaching 65 (designisimportant.wordpress.com)
- 84% of Americans are Anxious About Retirement (aakeller.wordpress.com)
- 7 Tips for Baby Boomers Turning 65 in 2011 (money.usnews.com)
- Don’t Trust Anybody Under 65 (reason.com)
Once again we are in a “war”-like (after all, no Congressional declaration) situation where we misread our “friends”:
Here’s a change that has happened in only a few hours with our Arab allies:
5:48 a.m. Tuesday ET, 11:13 a.m. Tuesday in Libya] The United Arab Emirates said at least two aircraft squadrons are ready to be deployed within 48 hours to support the international mission in Libya, a military leader said.
But only a couple of hours later:
[8:43 a.m. Tuesday ET, 2:43 p.m. Tuesday in Libya] The United Arab Emirates had been prepared to send two aircraft squadrons to participate in the international effort to enforce a no-fly zone over Libya, said Maj. Gen. (Staff) Pilot Khaled Abdullah Al-Buainnain – the former commander of the Emirates’ air force and air defense. However, he said, those plans have changed due to criticism by the United States and the European Union of the Gulf Cooperation Council‘s deployment of troops to help the monarchy stabilize Bahrain. The UAE has chosen not to take a military role in Libya until Washington and the European Union clarify their position on the use of troops in Bahrain, but it will contribute to the humanitarian effort in Libya, Al-Buainnain said.
I ask once again…why are we committing to more military action, which we can’t afford, with more “undeclared by Congress” war on countries that we are concerned with solely because they have oil (if we were really humanitarians we would be in the Ivory Coast and other countries)?
When is Congress going to quit fighting with each other and protect our economy and our people by directing the President to get us out of this crap (Constitutionally, it IS their function.) I am getting more and more depressed over the situation that lying politicians have gotten us into.
- “Arabs wonder: “Why Libya and why not Bahrain, Yemen, Tunisia or Egypt? “” and related posts (friday-lunch-club.blogspot.com)
- Libya: Arab failure to join attack raises doubts (telegraph.co.uk)
- “LIBYA: Arab League head backs off after criticizing airstrikes” and related posts (latimesblogs.latimes.com)
- U.S., allies seek to maintain Arab support for military intervention in Libya – Washington Post (news.google.com)
- Libya: A conflict of self-interest | Andrew Murray (guardian.co.uk)
- “Coalition of the Forced Into Acting on Libya Crumbles….” and related posts (massdiscussion.blogspot.com)
- The UAE Balks (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
- Libya Using Reporters as Shields (foxnews.com)