Blog Archives
Today’s swing state polls update…
Looks like Obama’a coming back in New Hampshire.
Here are the latest polls from the battleground states, updated as needed
Colorado: Romney 48%, Obama 47% (We Ask America)Colorado: Obama 50%, Romney 45% (YouGov)
Florida: Obama 49%, Romney 47% (YouGov)
Iowa: Obama 49%, Romney 46% (We Ask America)
Iowa: Obama 50%, Romney 46% (YouGov)
Nevada: Obama 50%, Romney 45% (YouGov)
New Hampshire: Obama 47%, Romney 47% (Suffolk)
North Carolina: Romney 49%, Obama 48% (YouGov)
Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 46% (YouGov)
Pennsylvania: Obama 50%, Romney 46% (Quinnipiac)
Pennsylvania: Obama 51%, Romney 45% (YouGov)
Virginia: Obama 46%, Romney 45% (YouGov)
OK… where is registration heading in swing states?
A Bloomberg analysis finds that Democrats hold the registration advantage over Republicans in four of six battleground states that will play a key role in the presidential election.
“Democrats have the edge over Republicans in Florida, Iowa, Nevada and North Carolina. In Colorado and New Hampshire, Republicans outnumber Democrats, according to the analysis of state data. Three other battlegrounds — Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin — don’t report registration statistics by party.”
What Fun! The Republicans now have Newt as a Winner :)
Newt Gingrich won the South Carolina Primary and this morning he exploited his win over all the network Sunday morning news shows. His ego glowed like a radium ion.
So Santorum has Iowa (we guess), Romney has New Hampshire, and Newt now has South Carolina. Now there is no REAL leader and we’re looking toward Florida to see what happens next.
I doubt that Ron Paul is going to quit yet. Wouldn’t it be funny if he took Florida?
There’s also the potential, now, for a brokered Republican Convention… this means that a wholly new candidate could be brought in by the Party and made nominee (Chris Christie, maybe?)
So now we have one candidate that often switches positions solely to get the vote (Mitt), one that makes Democrats look sane (Newt) and one who puts religion and ant-gay hysteria on top of governing the country (Santorum.)
As to which one of these Obama would prefer to tun against…who knows? Any one of them has great benefits for the Democrats. I’d prefer Santorum, but that is the least likely.
Quote of the Day – Is Romney’s Primary History Accurate?
“Did Rick Santorum win the Iowa caucus?
“That’s what it looks like if numbers from a caucus in the town of Moulton, Appanoose County, are correctly counted when the official certification begins Wednesday night.
“This not only would rewrite the election history of 2012 to date—it would invalidate the oft-repeated line that Mitt Romney is the only candidate to win both Iowa and New Hampshire. It would stop the inevitability narrative in its tracks.”
- John Avlon in The Daily Beast
Add this to his tax problem (and his teeny speaker’s fees) and it certainly doesn’t seem like a good week for Mitt.
Joh Huntsman is pulling out today…
After getting 17% of the New Hampshire vote, John Huntsman, probably the only true conservative in the race, is announcing his pull out later this morning (11 AM ET). Huntsman will most likely be throwing his support to Romney.
Huntsman was the candidate to make no hateful statements about Obama or his Republican competitors. His conservative positions were all about policy and he was the only candidate running with a sense that he was planning to govern the WHOLE country and not just rightists.
This is probably the best thing for Huntsman to do if he is planning on running again in 2016. He has established himself as a known candidate nationwide during the primaries so far and now he doesn’t have to continue with losses. Leaving the campaign while he is now in third place will make him a leader in the future Republican party.
Related articles
- Jon Huntsman to Drop Presidential Bid (treeofmamre.wordpress.com)
- John Huntsman Call It Quits; Set to Endorse Romney (thewesternexperience.com)
- Huntsman to exit, back Romney (politico.com)
- Huntsman to drop out of GOP race (firstread.msnbc.msn.com)
- Huntsman’s ‘ticket to ride’ started in Florida, ended before his return (tampabay.com)
- Ending Campaign, Huntsman Plans to Drop Out and Back Romney (swampland.time.com)
Taegan Goddard just posted this…
… on the Political Wire:
Romney Wins New Hampshire Primary
Based on exit polling (as of 8:15 PM), the TV networks declared Mitt Romney the winner of the Republican presidential primary in New Hampshire.
Ron Paul will finish a strong second and Jon Huntsman a more distant third.
Unless, of course, you don’t believe in exit Polling, this ends it here. Do you think Perry is smart enough to quit, or has he not thrown enough money away?
The Polls close in New Hampshire in about two hours…
… and none of the news programs have any idea of where the results will be. They are all bouncing around the idea of Romney as the winner without committing themselves to that as a final opinion… and the big controversy is who will come in second.
Will Paul screw up Romney’s lead? Will Huntsman’s apparent rise in poll numbers make him the second placer and hold Romney’s numbers down? And what about the angry drive of Gingrich who seems to want Romney destroyed?
On top of everything else, eyes are starting to turn to South Carolina with a question as to how many of these guys are going to be running there. Gingrich is already spending millions on anti-Romney films. Perry is using his New Hampshire campaigning to reach South Carolina audiences… he’s likely to be dead last in NH. He’s also the one most likely to disappear after tonight.
Then there’s Santorum. He doesn’t seem to have the same push he gained in Iowa and, given his views on contraception, welfare reform (ie: take money away from the poor, especially the black poor, so they will work) and his anti-gay marriage and adoption stance, he may be turning folks off – FINALLY!
If I were a Republican (that is sooo hard to say), I’d vote for Huntsman. At least he seems to be campaigning to be everyone’s president… not just right wing weirdos.
Meanwhile in South Carolina, here’s what’s polling:
- Mitt Romney‘s 27%
- Newt Gingrich‘s 23%
- Rick Santorum‘s 18%
- Ron Paul‘s 8%
- Rick Perry‘s 7%
- Stephen Colbert 5%
- Jon Huntsman‘s 4%
- Buddy Roemer‘s 1%
Stephen Colbert? Are people taking this prinmary seriously?
Quote for a Sunday (about Last Night’s Debate):
“But the real lesson of this debate is that this crew is the worst assembled for the nomination of a major party that I can recall.”
So true, so true. And this debate was only topped by this morning’s update Debate – or Romney hunt – where the five other clowns got to continue sniping.
Related articles
- Sunday’s GOP debate: 6 takeaways (politico.com)
- Oh My Sweet Jesus, We Just Finished the Last Debate, and Now There’s Another Debate? (slog.thestranger.com)
- Ledes from the NBC News/Facebook Debate (thepage.time.com)
- Double Dip Debate Dishing (hotair.com)
- Grading The Republican Debate (buzzfeed.com)
- Alan Schroeder: New Hampshire Double-header: A Tale of Two Debates (huffingtonpost.com)
A Weekend’s Entertainment – Everyone Against Romney!
The six remaining Republican presidential candidates start at 9 pm ET tonight in New Hampshire debating on ABC TV for two hours. Twelve hours later, at 9:00 am Sunday, they’ll take part in the NBC News/Facebook debate on Meet the Press. You can send in your questions on Facebook and attack Romney, too.
I expect the most fun from Newt Gingrich whose
sole objective seems to be getting even with Romney for the negative ads his PAC pulled off in Iowa. Next will be Ron Paul, who is getting just as negative.
And, of course, we will all look for another “Oooops!” from Perry, who is really playing to the South Carolina Audience.
So have a nice weekend. I know I will.
Related articles
- GOP Candidates Sharpen Knives for Back-to-Back Debates This Weekend (ibtimes.com)
- Romney And Other GOP Hopefuls Gear Up For Weekend Debates (boston.cbslocal.com)
- GOP debates a chance to throw Romney off stride (abclocal.go.com)
- Dual debates a chance to throw Romney off stride (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Candidates Look to Rein In Romney at NH Debates – Fox News (foxnews.com)
- Mitt Romney Could Lose Lead In Republican Presidential Contest After Dual Debates (huffingtonpost.com)
- Two Debates in 24 Hours (politicalwire.com)
- Back-To-Back Debates Could Impact Outcome Of NH Primary (boston.cbslocal.com)
Quote of the Day … perhaps one of the best of the last couple of months!
“Taking two positions on every issue, one on the left and one of the right, doesn’t make you a centrist. It makes you a charlatan.”
– David Axelrod on Mitt Romney
So we are now heading to New Hampshire where Newt Gingrich has already started to publish anti-Romney ads and the field has been reduced by one Bachmann (we thought we were going to lose Perry, too, but he’s still in, although doing his campaigning in South Carolina.)
Santorum is heading for NH and his score in Iowa is going to attract some money into his coffers, but New Hampshire is not primarily a born-again Xian state and he doesn’t really fit in.
Romney is going to have to move a little towards center to take New Hampshire, but he seems to have no trouble switching positions. Today John McCain endorsed him. You remember McCain… in the last Presidential election’s primaries, when they competed for the nomination, McCain accused Romney of “consistently flip-flopping on every issue.“
How things change.
Does it matter who wins tonight?
Maybe. Maybe one or two of these yoyos will drop out of the race. Bachmann, who should,
has said she won’t. Huntsman, who will come in at the bottom has not really campaigned here… he may be waiting to see what happens in New Hampshire.
Newt, if he comes in lower than fourth, will likely disappear. Santorum, if not in the top three will either drop out, or skip New Hampshire and throw all his remaining money into South Carolina.
Ron Paul, who is likely to come in second, should really not be in the race at all. I don’t think he is ready to drop out yet and will probably come in second to Romney tonight. Rick Parry is an unknown, but bottom level, quantity. If I were he and came in low tonight, I’d quit or look even more stupid…ooops!
In moving to New Hampshire, someone has to appear to be a moderate. Romney and Huntsman are the only two who can do that. Newt is threatening to do nothing but really dirty Romney attack ads in NH… this may have the backlash of doing Newt in. Let’s hope.
Related articles
- With focus on Iowa, Huntsman continues NH effort (sfgate.com)
- Downplaying New Hampshire (politicalwire.com)
- Closing In On Iowa — and South Carolina (swampland.time.com)
- Newt Gingrich to Mitt Romney: “Be honest” (piersmorgan.blogs.cnn.com)
- Jon Huntsman Defends Ad Attacking Ron Paul, Knocks Iowa Caucus 2012 (huffingtonpost.com)
- All eyes on Iowa today (boston.com)
- Newt: ‘I Don’t Think I’m Going To Win’ (huffingtonpost.com)
- Jon-Christopher Bua: The Iowa Test: State of Play (huffingtonpost.co.uk)
- All eyes on Iowa today – Boston.com (boston.com)
Fun and games at the bottom of the New Hampshire list…
“Politics is the entertainment branch of industry.”
John Huntsman, toiling at the bottom of the list in Iowa, is putting his effort into New Hampshire… and to do that he has released a video called “Unelectable” attacking Ron Paul (gee, you think he’d go after Romney instead of wasting his time on the Loser In Chief.)
Here it is:

























